HOME >>  HOME >> Latest Blog
Publish Date : 19 February 2017 - 10:21  ,  
News ID: 1768

If we don’t get decisive stances against Trump's administration, they will impose on us other deals like JCPOA.

TEHRAN(Basirat): Doctor Seyamak Bagheri (an expert on nuclear and strategic issues):The real purpose of US is to detour Russians from conception of resistance and regional issues. If Trump wants to do it, he should give many grants to the Russians to convince them with himself in Iran issue.

If we don’t get decisive stances against Trump's administration, they will impose on us other deals like JCPOA.
America cannot simply separate Russia from Iran and on the other hand Russia cannot be succeed to prevent trump from making radical decisions. It seems that Trump's radical decisions have not stability. There are obstacles toward these radical decisions on public opinions and elite circles of Donald trump. Also there are other obstacles against Trump like EU, Russia, china and other countries to permit him in making radical decisions.
As it predicts, with the entrance of Donald trump to the white house, he began his aggressive actions against Iran and in particular on JCPOA. His administration under the pretext of missile activities in Iran, requested for a meeting of the Security Council, which this meeting have no result. Trump also put Iran on a list of seven Muslim countries that their citizens  have been banned to enter in the US.
What is purpose of trump? Does he continue pressures against Iran to the point of a military confrontation? This means that will his rushed and crazy polices lead to the military confrontation while Arabic countries and UK encourage him. Does Russia avoid confrontation between Trump and Iran while as trump expressed friendship with Russia and on the other side there is a military cooperation between Russia and Iran?
Basirat Center for Political Studies has interviewed with Doctor Seyamak Bagheri (an expert on nuclear and strategic issues) and he will answer these questions.
Q: Iranian officials again stressed that the Iranian missile tests has not violated UN Resolution No 2231 after the Us have requested UN   Security  emergency Council   meeting to review the new Iranian missile tests. If you agree to have an overview, why these missile tests have not violated UN resolutions No 2231?
UN Resolution No 2231 have stressed that Iranian missile tests have not violated JCPOA not at all. There is no relation between JCPOA and UN Resolution No 2231 that if resolution violated, JCPOA will be violated or if JCPOA violated, the resolution will be violated. Therefore Iranian missile programs don't violate JCPOA and also missile tests don't violate UN Resolution No 2231.it is explicitly mentioned in Resolution 2231 that these actions cannot be a violation of resolution 2231. On the other hand, what is in the third paragraph of Appendix B of JCPOA, specifies that the Iranian missile activities, is not violation of JCPOA.
They have requested that Iran must not have activities related to ballistic missiles that these missiles are capable of delivering nuclear weapons. First, the word "request" is a recommendation and not a necessity and requirements. Second, they considered in the resolution ballistic missiles that capable of carrying nuclear weapons, Iran basically do not pursued production these missiles. So in this regard Iran missile activities are not violation of JCPOA. On the other hand, Islamic republic of Iran has pledged on the basis of JCPOA in period of fifteen to twenty years and supposed to act verification in long-term commitments. Iran have proved that  have no plan to produce atomic bomb and also severe surveillance have concentrated on nuclear program of Iran on the basis of western officials confession. as a result, there is no meaning to say long-range and ballistic missiles, is a violation of Resolution 2231.
The real purpose of western countries toward pressure policy on nuclear issue is to distort orientations of Iran. But they don’t directly refer to nuclear issue and have concentrated on missile issues to correlate nuclear and missile issue. They want to make the global consensus against Iran with this method. The missile power of Iran cannot convince world and public opinions in order to they approve strict international rule against Iran. Missile programs have conception of defense for any country, especially for Iran that have placed in the chaotic region. There are an actual threats in front of Islamic republic of Iran and any open-minded approve this. So, why they continue to challenge Iran's missile program, and argued that is a violation of resolution? They want to correlate nuclear issue to missile program and in this way encourage public opinions of world against Iran and the other hand, governments again reach a consensus against Iran.
Any more, those who have a great understanding in the international system and the various governments and even European governments have confirmed that Iran missile program is not violation of resolutions.
It is interesting that Mr. Amano have expressed concerns over Iran's missile program on six-month report of Iran’s nuclear program but his argument on concerns over Iran's missile program was that Iran does not have missile activities that violate the spirit and general purpose of JCPOA. He also understands that missile program is not violation of resolutions and explicitly this cannot violate  provisions of JCPOA. So this is a political and psychological
Warfare and type of escape forward that Americans pursue it.

Q: with regard to close relations between Putin and Trump and the other hand close relations between Russia and Iran, how much Russian government can be succeeded to prevent Trump in making radical decisions?
Although expression of friendship between Trump and Putin have been proposed, it seems that Trump will follow a complicated game. If we assume that the issue of West Asia is very important and it is clue of America problems in foreign policy of Trump administration, Russian government have played an important role in West Asia and benefits of US in have been experienced a challenge with regard the events have occurred in West Asia region, so US government have planned a complicated game to retaliate its losses . The real purpose of US is to detour Russians from conception of resistance and regional issues. If Trump wants to do it, he should give many grants to the Russians to convince them with himself in Iran issue. Ukraine, Syria issue and NATO influence in the region and the America actions around Russia, these are issues that US should resolve with the Russians. Certainly, these issues cannot easily resolved.

If we don’t get decisive stances against Trump's administration, they will impose on us other deals like JCPOA.
  

Comments