Political commentator Yadollah Javani has, in an article published on the
Persian-language Basirat news website, weighed in on Washington's double
standards vis-à-vis Iran and Iranian people. The full text of the analytical
piece follows.
Over the past few days, some US, Zionist, European and Saudi officials tried, in
one way or another, to create the impression that they have stood by Iranian
people and supported their demands. Accordingly, Western, Zionist and some Arab
media outlets claimed they were supporters of Iranians and their demands. Amid
such claims of support, a question comes to mind, and that is who they think
Iranian people are?
The question becomes all the more important when one ponders on US President
Donald Trump's calling Iranians a "terrorist nation!" Also, a US secretary of
state said years ago that the root of the Iranian nation must be burned! The
answer to the above-mentioned question contains a delicate point. The Americans
define key concepts in the language of politics with their own criteria,
concepts such as human rights, freedom, independence, peace, justice, security,
terrorism and people. Therefore, when US statesmen introduce themselves as
advocates of peace, stability, human rights, security and people, one should pay
attention to the way they define the concepts.
In this regard, we can categorize every one of these fundamental concepts in the
language of politics into "good" and "bad" based on the definitions given by the
Americans. For instance, in the eyes of Washington, there is both good terrorism
and bad terrorism.
From the Americans' standpoint, people in every country are categorized into
good and bad. When Trump calls Iranians terrorists, he refers the group of
people who are "bad" in the eyes of the US. "Good" people in Iran, according to
Washington, are those who are ready to serve as mercenaries for the US and stand
up to the Islamic Republic of Iran's establishment and the values of the Islamic
Revolution.
"Bad" people, from the Americans' point of view, are those who insist on their
Islamic, revolutionary and national identity, and stand up to the United States
and its excessive demands in order to safeguard their independence and dignity.
So, in Iran, the US seeks to back and reinforce those who, due to whatever
reason and with whatever motive, set the stage for the US to regain its
domination over Iran. They are the ones who are standing against the Islamic
Republic of Iran.
With such a criterion, if a few hundred people in a city with a population of a
few hundred thousand stage riots and vandalize public property and chant
iconoclastic slogans, those few hundred are Iranian people in the eyes of the
Americans and should be supported. The US says it should lend its unflinching
support to such people through the UN Security Council and the imposition of
sanctions on Iran over human rights issues. But if in the same city, hundreds of
thousands of people take to the streets following the riots to express their
support for the Islamic Republic of Iran's establishment and the values of the
Islamic Revolution, they are not people; rather, they are supporters of the
Islamic Republic! In other words, they are the very same "bad" people who must
be called terrorists and whose roots must be burned.
Such behaviour by the Americans has its roots in their arrogant attitude.
Arrogant Americans are, in fact, those who regard their interests as a yardstick
against which to measure all good and evil, and who act accordingly. So, if a
nation such as oppressed Yemenis stands against the US, that nation must be
eliminated. But, on the other hand, if a tyrannical regime such as the Al Saud
rulers serves the interests of the US, it must be given all-out support.
SOURCE: Basirat Persian Website