
BASIRAT POLITICAL CENTER
Dr.Sajad.Abedi/ University professor
The onset of the political crisis in Iraq and Syria led 
regional and transnational actors to pursue a particular policy in the face of 
insecurity, based on their own interests. Given the geopolitical and 
geostrategic significance of the two countries in Southwest Asia, the approaches 
of each of these actors differed in their dealings with the story. Strategies 
and policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran, compared to some supporters of 
chaos and insecurity in the field of foreign policy based on religious 
teachings, rationality, interests of the Islamic nation and national interests, 
It is therefore very different from the contradictory and shaky policies of the governments contending to fight terrorism, human rights and democracy.
Change the rule of game in Syria
With the onset of the Syrian crisis and the role of regional and transnational 
states that were largely in the interests of the terrorists and rioters, Iran 
also expressed its willingness to resolve the crisis with Syria's desire. 
Initially, activities began on diplomacy, and Iran was able to play a diplomatic 
role, and invited some countries, such as Russia and China, to play a more 
active presence in the Syrian case. Despite the effective efforts in this field, 
Iran came to the conclusion that not all diplomacy capacities could be used to 
cope with insecurity and they have to pursue the issues more seriously. Although 
this presence declaration was not so favorable to the US and its allies, it was 
natural that the national interests of each country, such as Iran, were at the 
head of national security, and our country also has a tolerance border to these 
areas. The Islamic Republic of Iran  could not simply witness the crisis of 
various confrontational and terrorist groups and their supporters in the region, 
with only the role of spectator in the scene. Defense policy of Iran in MENA 
region has based on  the principles ,  therefore on the basis of these 
principles, Iran protects the sovereignty of legitimate and legal governments. 
Naturally, due to the principled belief of the Islamic Republic of Iran about 
the sovereignty of the Syrian people to determine their political destiny, the 
support of the legal government of the country against insurgents was emphasized 
as a general principle in foreign policy. In the battlefield and defense policy, 
the Syrian government faced turbulence on the one hand, which was gradually 
expanding its influence, and on the other hand, US and its allies make any 
attempt to support terrorists militarily and financially  . The Syrian 
government's approach and its defense policy  to deal with this crisis was 
accompanied by weaknesses and in the set of these approaches, there was little 
efficiency to solve the problem. The weakness in identifying the causes and 
sources of insecurity and the lack of use of the popular mobilization in dealing 
with terrorists and the unfamiliarity of the Syrian classical army with urban 
warfare led to a more complicated crisis.
The presence of these factors led 
Syria to invite Iran to fight the terrorists, and the Islamic Revolutionary 
Guards Corps (IRGC), as the executive arm of the regime, went to this country 
for guidance and controversial activities. With the presence of the IRGC in the 
area and the use of military advisories by the Iranian forces, the Syrian army 
began to regain defenses, and practically with changing the rules of the game, 
The terrorist attacks were stopped in many areas. It was so, the classical 
Syrian army has developed its defense capability in dealing with terrorists and 
has been able to learn urban warfare techniques with the help of the IRGC's 
training and Finding a defense policy  with the lowest casualties. Using 
the power and capacity of the popular mobilization and communication with tribes 
and tribesmen, as well as the followers of religions and different creeds and 
the intelligence assistance provided by the Syrian army, put the terrorists in a 
state of turmoil. Those countries who  had pursued the  the Syrian 
conflict  on the basis of  their arrogant goals , now saw their hopes 
unattainable. Westerners and other supporters of the terrorist currents in this 
situation were completely concerned about the changing circumstances on the 
battlefield and tried to accuse Iran of military intervention in Syria. Although 
it was very good at first glance on its interest, but the release of documents 
from the insurgents proved that Western, Arabian and Hebrew axis  support 
Terrorist and Takfiri groups in obvious and hidden . Along with this, the 
victory of the Axis of Resistance in Aleppo as a result of the military 
assistance and military advisories of IRGC and the widespread use of mass 
mobilization was a turning point in the Syrian case, strengthening the Syrian 
government's position to continue to confront the insurgents and Terrorist 
groups. The influential role of the IRGC in Syria has led advocates of 
terrorism, especially the United States, who used to take all the necessary 
tools to weaken Iran's position in the region, Following the developments on the 
Syrian front, they were forced to confess the role of the Islamic Republic of 
Iran to resolve the crisis and urge Iran to engage in Syrian settlement talks.
When ISIL borders narrowed
The rise of ISIL as a terrorist power in Iraq and Syria has caused changes in 
equations in the region since a few years ago. The rapid progress of the Takfiri 
(unbeliever) group in the Iraqi crisis, had created difficult conditions. The 
ISIL have faced little resistance of IRAQ and Syria. The combat capability of 
this terrorist group and the support of the Arab countries of the region on the 
one hand, and the apparent betrayal of some of the commanders of the middle 
classes of the Iraqi Army and the Ba'athist survivors of the Saddam Hussein era, 
It provided the ground for the Takfiri group to flourish in military arena like 
a rebel horse for a long time and occupy vast sections of Iraq's five major 
provinces. In those days, Invisible whispers of some US-led countries was 
announced, the formation of an unlucky coalition would be called in the name of 
the anti-ISIL coalition, but its initial rumblings fell from the very first days 
of its formation. The bitter satire was that some of the Arab and European 
countries that participated in this coalition were the main suppliers of 
financial and weaponry of ISIL. The US and European advanced aircraft fighters 
targeted civilians instead of bombing the positions of this takfiri (unbeliever) 
group. Naturally, these promotional measures did not contribute to containment 
of terrorism but it was also strengthened it. Since Iran saw the lack of 
integrity  between participating members as the most important reason for 
the failure of the coalition, has pursued another path to assist the Iraqi 
people to repel ISIL. Arms assistance and advisory services to the army and 
volunteer groups in Iraq were one of the effective ways for Iran to eliminate 
this intrigue. For example, Massoud Barzani, head of the Kurdish region of Iraq, 
said in a news conference that Tehran has provided weapons to Peshmerga forces. 
We demanded weapons and Iran was the first country to provide us weapons. The 
creation of a Hashd al-Sha'abi in Iraq was a great step that the Islamic 
Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) took to increase the military power of the people 
and the army against ISIL , which caused to open the blind knot of the confused 
Iraqi crisis in a large extent. The successful operation of the IRGC in Iraq's 
field greatly weakened the role of the US-led anti-ISIL coalition in the country 
and raised Iran's position as the guiding and the leadership of the resistance. 
The military and intellectual confrontation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards 
Corps with ISIL as the most dangerous combat force against the resistance axis, 
while limiting the sphere of influence and the circle of their activities, has 
also led to the defense of Iraq's territorial integrity. The IRGC's advisory 
operations in Iraq led to mobilization of different a range of country including 
the Kurds, Sunni tribes and Shi'a Hadesh al-Sha'bi against ISIL, and retreating 
terrorists and Takfiris(unbeliever) from the occupied territories. The other 
thing was that as a result of these efforts, the ghost of war and chaos that had 
shadowed Iran's border lines in the early days had been forbidden hundreds of 
kilometers away.
Meanwhile, the role of Major General Hajj. Qassim. Soleimani is undeniable. The nations of the region considered him  as one of the greatest saviors . therefore, the Strength of the IRGC in resolute clash with regional terrorists, 
has increased our soft power for boosting bargaining and growing popularity in 
other countries.