BASIRAT POLITICAL CENTER
Dr.Sajad.Abedi/ University professor
The onset of the political crisis in Iraq and Syria led
regional and transnational actors to pursue a particular policy in the face of
insecurity, based on their own interests. Given the geopolitical and
geostrategic significance of the two countries in Southwest Asia, the approaches
of each of these actors differed in their dealings with the story. Strategies
and policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran, compared to some supporters of
chaos and insecurity in the field of foreign policy based on religious
teachings, rationality, interests of the Islamic nation and national interests,
It is therefore very different from the contradictory and shaky policies of the governments contending to fight terrorism, human rights and democracy.
Change the rule of game in Syria
With the onset of the Syrian crisis and the role of regional and transnational
states that were largely in the interests of the terrorists and rioters, Iran
also expressed its willingness to resolve the crisis with Syria's desire.
Initially, activities began on diplomacy, and Iran was able to play a diplomatic
role, and invited some countries, such as Russia and China, to play a more
active presence in the Syrian case. Despite the effective efforts in this field,
Iran came to the conclusion that not all diplomacy capacities could be used to
cope with insecurity and they have to pursue the issues more seriously. Although
this presence declaration was not so favorable to the US and its allies, it was
natural that the national interests of each country, such as Iran, were at the
head of national security, and our country also has a tolerance border to these
areas. The Islamic Republic of Iran could not simply witness the crisis of
various confrontational and terrorist groups and their supporters in the region,
with only the role of spectator in the scene. Defense policy of Iran in MENA
region has based on the principles , therefore on the basis of these
principles, Iran protects the sovereignty of legitimate and legal governments.
Naturally, due to the principled belief of the Islamic Republic of Iran about
the sovereignty of the Syrian people to determine their political destiny, the
support of the legal government of the country against insurgents was emphasized
as a general principle in foreign policy. In the battlefield and defense policy,
the Syrian government faced turbulence on the one hand, which was gradually
expanding its influence, and on the other hand, US and its allies make any
attempt to support terrorists militarily and financially . The Syrian
government's approach and its defense policy to deal with this crisis was
accompanied by weaknesses and in the set of these approaches, there was little
efficiency to solve the problem. The weakness in identifying the causes and
sources of insecurity and the lack of use of the popular mobilization in dealing
with terrorists and the unfamiliarity of the Syrian classical army with urban
warfare led to a more complicated crisis.
The presence of these factors led
Syria to invite Iran to fight the terrorists, and the Islamic Revolutionary
Guards Corps (IRGC), as the executive arm of the regime, went to this country
for guidance and controversial activities. With the presence of the IRGC in the
area and the use of military advisories by the Iranian forces, the Syrian army
began to regain defenses, and practically with changing the rules of the game,
The terrorist attacks were stopped in many areas. It was so, the classical
Syrian army has developed its defense capability in dealing with terrorists and
has been able to learn urban warfare techniques with the help of the IRGC's
training and Finding a defense policy with the lowest casualties. Using
the power and capacity of the popular mobilization and communication with tribes
and tribesmen, as well as the followers of religions and different creeds and
the intelligence assistance provided by the Syrian army, put the terrorists in a
state of turmoil. Those countries who had pursued the the Syrian
conflict on the basis of their arrogant goals , now saw their hopes
unattainable. Westerners and other supporters of the terrorist currents in this
situation were completely concerned about the changing circumstances on the
battlefield and tried to accuse Iran of military intervention in Syria. Although
it was very good at first glance on its interest, but the release of documents
from the insurgents proved that Western, Arabian and Hebrew axis support
Terrorist and Takfiri groups in obvious and hidden . Along with this, the
victory of the Axis of Resistance in Aleppo as a result of the military
assistance and military advisories of IRGC and the widespread use of mass
mobilization was a turning point in the Syrian case, strengthening the Syrian
government's position to continue to confront the insurgents and Terrorist
groups. The influential role of the IRGC in Syria has led advocates of
terrorism, especially the United States, who used to take all the necessary
tools to weaken Iran's position in the region, Following the developments on the
Syrian front, they were forced to confess the role of the Islamic Republic of
Iran to resolve the crisis and urge Iran to engage in Syrian settlement talks.
When ISIL borders narrowed
The rise of ISIL as a terrorist power in Iraq and Syria has caused changes in
equations in the region since a few years ago. The rapid progress of the Takfiri
(unbeliever) group in the Iraqi crisis, had created difficult conditions. The
ISIL have faced little resistance of IRAQ and Syria. The combat capability of
this terrorist group and the support of the Arab countries of the region on the
one hand, and the apparent betrayal of some of the commanders of the middle
classes of the Iraqi Army and the Ba'athist survivors of the Saddam Hussein era,
It provided the ground for the Takfiri group to flourish in military arena like
a rebel horse for a long time and occupy vast sections of Iraq's five major
provinces. In those days, Invisible whispers of some US-led countries was
announced, the formation of an unlucky coalition would be called in the name of
the anti-ISIL coalition, but its initial rumblings fell from the very first days
of its formation. The bitter satire was that some of the Arab and European
countries that participated in this coalition were the main suppliers of
financial and weaponry of ISIL. The US and European advanced aircraft fighters
targeted civilians instead of bombing the positions of this takfiri (unbeliever)
group. Naturally, these promotional measures did not contribute to containment
of terrorism but it was also strengthened it. Since Iran saw the lack of
integrity between participating members as the most important reason for
the failure of the coalition, has pursued another path to assist the Iraqi
people to repel ISIL. Arms assistance and advisory services to the army and
volunteer groups in Iraq were one of the effective ways for Iran to eliminate
this intrigue. For example, Massoud Barzani, head of the Kurdish region of Iraq,
said in a news conference that Tehran has provided weapons to Peshmerga forces.
We demanded weapons and Iran was the first country to provide us weapons. The
creation of a Hashd al-Sha'abi in Iraq was a great step that the Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) took to increase the military power of the people
and the army against ISIL , which caused to open the blind knot of the confused
Iraqi crisis in a large extent. The successful operation of the IRGC in Iraq's
field greatly weakened the role of the US-led anti-ISIL coalition in the country
and raised Iran's position as the guiding and the leadership of the resistance.
The military and intellectual confrontation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards
Corps with ISIL as the most dangerous combat force against the resistance axis,
while limiting the sphere of influence and the circle of their activities, has
also led to the defense of Iraq's territorial integrity. The IRGC's advisory
operations in Iraq led to mobilization of different a range of country including
the Kurds, Sunni tribes and Shi'a Hadesh al-Sha'bi against ISIL, and retreating
terrorists and Takfiris(unbeliever) from the occupied territories. The other
thing was that as a result of these efforts, the ghost of war and chaos that had
shadowed Iran's border lines in the early days had been forbidden hundreds of
kilometers away.
Meanwhile, the role of Major General Hajj. Qassim. Soleimani is undeniable. The nations of the region considered him as one of the greatest saviors . therefore, the Strength of the IRGC in resolute clash with regional terrorists,
has increased our soft power for boosting bargaining and growing popularity in
other countries.