Political analyst Yadollah Javani has, in an article published by Basirat news
website, weighed in on the possible stance of the European countries regarding
the JCPOA, and whether or not Europe can be trusted to secure Iran’s interests
under the nuclear deal. The full text of the analytical piece follows.
When the US government pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal known as the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) days ago, it had not lived up to any of its
commitments under the deal since the agreement went into effect on January 16,
2016. Trump’s pretexts were, in fact, the same excessive demands that the
Americans thought would be met through the JCPOA. It should not be forgotten
that Obama, too, said Iran would reap the benefits of the JCPOA only if it
complied with the "spirit” of the deal! Therefore, there is no difference
between Trump and Obama in this respect; rather, the difference is in the
methods used by them to achieve their domineering and excessive objectives. From
Obama’s standpoint, among the measures that could prove Iran’s abidance by the
spirit of the JCPOA would be a change in Iran’s policies and behavior on defense
and military issues, especially the missile domain, and regional issues, as well
as on support for oppressed nations, the resistance front and human rights. In
addition to these, Trump has also called for the revision of the JCPOA in a bid
to make restrictions on Iran’s nuclear activities permanent. To put it in a
nutshell, the Americans believed that with the nuclear JCPOA, Iran would have no
other choice but to accept missile, regional, human rights and other JCPOAs,
would deviate from the path of the Revolution (whose spirit is the Iranian
nation’s independence and freedom) and would step onto the path desired by the
West.
Nevertheless, with the vigilance of the Iranian nation and under the guidelines
of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, not only did
this disaster not happen and the dignity and independence of the Iranian nation
were preserved, but also Iran has, in recent years, secured major and strategic
achievements and victories in the region.
The United States’ failure prompted the country to withdraw from the JCPOA upon
Trump’s order, though Washington had practically never entered the agreement as
it had not made good on its obligations under the deal. In a brazen speech where
Trump announced the United States’ pullout from the JCPOA, he said, "I am
announcing today that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear
deal. In a few moments, I will sign a presidential memorandum to begin
reinstating U.S. nuclear sanctions on the Iranian regime. We will be instituting
the highest level of economic sanction. Any nation that helps Iran in its quest
for nuclear weapons could also be strongly sanctioned by the United States.”
When the Trump administration came to power and it reiterated that Washington
would withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal, a viewpoint emerged in Iran that it
would be possible to stay in the JCPOA with the Europeans. Accordingly, Iranian
President Hassan Rouhani reacted to Trump’s announcement that the US would leave
the agreement, and said, "From this moment, the JCPOA would be between Iran and
the five countries. From this moment, the ‘P5+1’ has lost the ‘1’ and under the
current circumstances we should wait to see how major world countries will act
vis-à-vis the agreement. I have instructed the Foreign Ministry to conduct the
necessary consultations and talks and make the necessary arrangements with the
European countries as well as two other big countries. If at the end of this
deadline and short period of time we come to the conclusion that with the
cooperation of all five countries we will be able to secure the Iranian nation’s
demands under the JCPOA, the agreement will remain in place despite the United
States and Israel’s will and their efforts and the discourteous remarks made by
Trump tonight, and we can take steps to advance peace and security in the region
and across the world.
Now, the question is whether or not the Europeans will act independently from
the US and deliver on their commitments under the JCPOA protect our national
interests or not. The answer is "No” due to two reasons:
1. Since the JCPOA came into force, the Europeans have, like the Americans,
called for a shift in Iran’s policies and behavior in different domains. In
other words, Europe and the US have both wanted Iran over the past year to
accept a second, third, or fourth JCPOA. Now, with the withdrawal of the US from
the JCPOA, the heads of the three European states have stressed the need to
remain in the agreement while emphasizing the same excessive demands that they
themselves and Washington have had. In fact, Europe’s policy, in word, will be
to stay in the JCPOA, and in deed, will be to get on board with the US in
pressuring Iran.
This important point can be understood from a statement of leaders of Britain,
France and Germany issued after Washington’s pullout from the JCPOA. The
statement highlights a few points:
- We three European countries will remain committed to the JCPOA.
- Iran should remain committed to its obligations under the JCPOA.
- The International Atomic Energy Agency (JCPOA) should be able to continue its
long-term monitoring and verification work without any obstacles and
restrictions.
- While the JCPOA should be preserved, we still agree that other issues need to
be addressed. A long-term framework should be defined for some of the
regulations of the JCPOA which expire after 2025.
- Our commitment to ensure the security of our partners in the Middle East
region is unconditional, and we should, in a meaningful way, address common
concerns regarding the ballistic missile program and destabilizing activities in
the region, especially in Syria, Iraq and Yemen.
Pondering upon the above-mentioned excerpts from the joint statement by the
three European countries show that Europe is stressing the same demands that
Washington has from Iran. In a phone conversation with President Rouhani, German
Chancellor Angela Merkel underscored some of Washington’s demands such as talks
on Iran’s missile program and the country’s activities in the region.
Incontrovertibly, the Europeans will, in their talks with Iran, announce that
Iran’s reaping the economic benefits of the nuclear agreement is conditioned
upon Tehran’s accepting to attend negotiations what would lead to second, third,
and fourth JCPOA without the presence of the US. From Europe’s point of view,
increasing US sanctions on Iran, especially the secondary sanctions, will be the
driving force behind these negotiations. This means that the US and Europe have
shared the tasks to be done for the era following Washington’s withdrawal from
the JCPOA, and Europe will not adopt an independent policy vis-à-vis Iran.
2. The European governments’ resistance against Washington’s secondary sanctions
will be the sine qua non for securing Iran’s economic interests via
Tehran-Europe cooperation within the framework of the JCPOA. Will Europe enter
and economic war with the US for the sake of Iran? Will European governments
reciprocate by fining American firms in retaliation for Washington fining
European companies? Such a thing will definitely not happen. Under no
circumstances will the Europeans prioritize Iran over the US.
So, the Islamic Republic of Iran should be realistic when it comes to securing
its national interests and dignity and not to fall for the joint scheme
engineered by the US and Europe. This reality has, time and again, been stressed
by Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei. He once again
highlighted the point after Washington’s withdrawal from the JCPOA.
"From day one, I kept telling not to trust the US! … The result is what you are
seeing now,” said the Leader.
"Two years and a half have passed, and we have fulfilled all our commitments,
and now this guy says he does not accept the deal and will withdraw from it and
will do such and such. And now some are saying that they want to keep the JCPOA
with the three European countries. I do not trust these three countries, either.
I’m telling you not to trust them, either. If you want a deal, get guarantees,
tangible guarantees; otherwise, they will do the same thing that the US did … If
you cannot secure such a definitive guarantee, and I think you are highly
unlikely to be able to get guarantees, then it will not be possible to keep
moving on the path we are now,” the Leader noted.
Ayatollah Khamenei elaborated on the current situation based on a realistic view
while shedding light on the intentions of the Western governments, saying,
"Today, the country’s officials are facing a major test; Will they secure the
dignity and power of this lovely nation or not? The dignity of this nation must
be ensured. The nation’s interests must be secured.”