"Washington seems keen to keep its prime assets, not least Daesh commanders, in
the region for 'divide and rule' operations which help sustain a pretext for US
bases across the region,” Professor Tim Anderson, a lecturer at the University
of Sydney, said in an interview with the Tasnim News Agency.
"Driving divisions between peoples, with the help of Israel and the Saudis, and
preventing the normal peaceful integration of neighboring countries of the
region, has become a key to US strategy in West Asia,” he added.
Professor Tim Anderson is a distinguished author and senior lecturer of
political economy at the University of Sydney, Australia. Author of the 'The
Dirty War on Syria', he has been largely published on various issues
particularly the Syrian crisis.
The following is the full text of the interview:
Tasnim: Recent evidence shows that the Daesh (ISIS or ISIL) terrorist group is
on the rise in war-torn Afghanistan with the support of the US government.
According to Tasnim dispatches, a large number of prisoners, all of whom senior
members of Daesh, recently broke out of a Taliban prison in northwest
Afghanistan after US troops helped them escape through a covert operation. Given
that Daesh's so-called caliphate has collapsed in Syria and Iraq, what goal is
Washington pursuing by transferring the terrorists to Afghanistan and
strengthening them?
Anderson: Washington seems keen to keep its prime assets, not least Daesh
commanders, in the region for 'divide and rule' operations which help sustain a
pretext for US bases across the region. Driving divisions between peoples, with
the help of Israel and the Saudis, and preventing the normal peaceful
integration of neighboring countries of the region, has become a key to US
strategy in West Asia. That is also why they wish to keep their own troops
stationed on the borders of Syria-Iraq, and surrounding Iran. Washington is
reported to have lost some of its special forces soldiers in the operation to
free Daesh fighters from a Taliban prison.
That can raise an image problem for Washington back home, where US soldiers
dying to rescue Daesh fighters does not look good, given the well-publicized but
false pretext ('fighting Daesh') for US troop presence in much of the region.
Tasnim: As you know, some regional countries, including Iran, have been
sensitive about the presence of Daesh in Afghanistan due to their national
security concerns. How justifiable do you see their concerns?
Anderson: Of course, Iran will be concerned about Daesh in Afghanistan, as they
are about Daesh in Iraq and Syria and in the Caucasus. Iran is the chief target
of both Israel and Washington, because of its leading independent role. Not that
long ago the Saudi regime (chief sponsor of terrorism and effectively a 'cat's
paw' for the US in West Asia) sent in Daesh terror attacks on Iran's National
Assembly (parliament), the Imam Khomeini mausoleum and, more recently against a
military parade. Riyadh has even tried to recruit for Daesh, with limited
success, within Iran. There has been an ongoing war - including economic,
terrorist and propaganda wars - against Iran ever since 1979. There can be
little doubt that Daesh assets in the region are being mobilized against the
Islamic Republic of Iran.
Tasnim: Do you think that Daesh would be able to establish a foothold in
Afghanistan given the fact that the Muslim people in the country are strongly
opposed to them and their extremist ideologies?
Anderson: It will indeed be difficult for Daesh to build support within
Afghanistan. First, the Afghan people are fiercely and famously independent.
Second, while extremism in Afghanistan was fed by Washington in the 1980s, the
particular strains of fanaticism in that country come from the Deobandi (South
Asian) and not from the Salafi (Persian Gulf Arab) traditions. Although these
can appear similar to outsiders, Deobandis and Salafis generally do not get
along. However Saudi money can broker some alliances, with local intermediaries.
We have seen, for example, some Pakistani mercenaries within Daesh groups in
Syria.